Denman, A M · Postgraduate medical journal · 1990 · DOI
This 1990 opinion piece argues that ME/CFS should be understood through practical, straightforward clinical observation rather than overly complex theories. The author advocates for a 'common sense' approach to recognizing and managing the condition based on what doctors actually observe in patients.
This historical perspective captures an important moment when ME/CFS legitimacy was still being debated in mainstream medical literature. It represents efforts by some clinicians to advocate for recognition of the condition and encourage practical clinical approaches, which was relevant during a period when many patients faced dismissal of their symptoms.
This opinion piece does not establish any causal mechanisms, biological markers, or treatment efficacy through evidence. It makes no claims about disease pathophysiology and cannot validate any specific diagnostic criteria or management strategies. As a commentary without original research data, it reflects one clinician's perspective rather than established facts.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →