Friedberg, Fred, Sohl, Stephanie, Schmeizer, Brett · Journal of psychosomatic research · 2007 · DOI
This study looked at how many scientific articles about ME/CFS were published between 1995 and 2004, and compared this to articles about fibromyalgia and fatigue. The researchers found that while articles about fibromyalgia and general fatigue increased significantly during this decade, the number of ME/CFS articles stayed relatively flat. This suggests that ME/CFS was not receiving growing research attention compared to similar conditions.
This study documents a concerning gap in research attention to ME/CFS relative to comparable conditions during the 1990s–2000s. Understanding publication trends can reveal whether research funding and scientific interest are keeping pace with disease burden, and may help advocates and researchers identify underexplored areas of ME/CFS science that need investment.
This study measures only the quantity of published articles, not their quality, citations, funding levels, or clinical impact. It does not explain *why* ME/CFS publication rates plateaued—whether due to funding constraints, reduced researcher interest, lack of breakthroughs, or other factors. Publication counts also do not directly reflect the state of scientific understanding or progress in the field.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →