Haig-Ferguson, Andrew, Loades, Maria, Whittle, Charlotte et al. · Internet interventions · 2019 · DOI
This study looked at whether young people with ME/CFS could receive therapy through video calls (like Skype) instead of traveling to hospital appointments. Researchers interviewed 12 young patients, 6 parents, and 9 healthcare workers about their experiences. Most people found video appointments helpful for reducing travel, though some worried about privacy and felt that something was lost compared to face-to-face meetings.
Access to specialist ME/CFS services remains a significant barrier for many families, particularly those living far from specialist centers. This study provides evidence that videoconferencing could expand treatment access for pediatric patients, while identifying specific implementation considerations. Understanding both benefits and limitations helps guide equitable service delivery for a population with limited specialist resources.
This qualitative study does not establish the clinical effectiveness of videoconferencing therapy compared to in-person treatment—it documents experiences only. It cannot prove that videoconferencing is equally effective for all patients or that it should replace in-person appointments. The findings reflect one specialist service and may not generalize to other regions, patient populations, or treatment modalities.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →