Hammer, Sabine, Monaca, Clara, Hoelz, Annika et al. · Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen · 2025 · DOI
This study asked 264 long COVID patients about their experiences with doctors and healthcare services. Most patients reported that healthcare providers don't understand their condition, often dismiss it as psychological, and sometimes recommend treatments that make them sicker. Patients felt stigmatized and unsupported, with some waiting up to two years just to see a specialist.
This study documents systematic barriers to care and evidence of iatrogenic harm caused by psychosomatic framing and inappropriate therapeutic recommendations—findings directly applicable to ME/CFS, which overlaps significantly with long COVID. The data provide crucial validation of patient experiences and highlight urgent needs for provider education and specialized care infrastructure that would benefit both populations.
This qualitative study does not establish causation between specific treatments and health deterioration, nor does it quantify the prevalence of these barriers across all healthcare systems. The findings are specific to German healthcare and patient populations willing to report to this system, so results may not generalize to other countries or healthcare models.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →