E2 ModerateModerate confidencePEM not requiredCross-SectionalPeer-reviewedMachine draft
Well-being in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Relationship to Symptoms and Psychological Distress.
Jackson, H, MacLeod, A K · Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2017 · DOI
Quick Summary
This study looked at well-being in people with ME/CFS, not just focusing on what's wrong, but also on what's right. Researchers found that people with ME/CFS had lower well-being than healthy people, especially in areas like personal growth, feeling in control of life, and self-acceptance. Importantly, well-being was more connected to emotional and psychological symptoms than to physical fatigue itself, suggesting that treating the emotional side of living with ME/CFS might be just as important as treating the fatigue.
Why It Matters
Most ME/CFS research focuses on illness and distress rather than positive functioning. This study identifies specific well-being deficits that could become treatment targets, suggesting that improving quality of life and psychological functioning may enhance existing therapies that currently leave many patients with residual symptoms.
Observed Findings
- CFS participants scored significantly lower than matched controls on five of six Ryff well-being dimensions.
- Well-being dimensions were largely independent of physical fatigue severity but strongly correlated with psychological fatigue components.
- Personal growth, environmental mastery, and self-acceptance showed particularly marked deficits in the CFS group.
- Five dimensions of well-being uniquely predicted symptomatology in multiple regression analysis.
- CFS participants reported elevated anxiety and depression alongside reduced well-being scores.
Inferred Conclusions
- Well-being deficits in ME/CFS are multidimensional and may be driven primarily by psychological factors and the burden of chronic illness rather than by physical symptom severity alone.
- Targeting well-being dimensions—particularly personal growth, environmental mastery, and self-acceptance—may offer new treatment opportunities beyond symptom-focused approaches.
- Standard treatments addressing negative constructs may be more effective if combined with interventions that actively promote positive psychological functioning.
Remaining Questions
- Do interventions specifically targeting well-being deficits improve fatigue, function, or other ME/CFS symptoms?
What This Study Does Not Prove
This study does not prove that improving well-being will reduce physical fatigue or other ME/CFS symptoms—it only shows these measures are associated. The cross-sectional design cannot determine whether low well-being causes psychological distress or vice versa. The findings are observational and do not establish whether well-being interventions would actually improve treatment outcomes.
Tags
Symptom:Cognitive DysfunctionFatigue
Method Flag:Weak Case DefinitionSmall SampleExploratory Only
Metadata
- DOI
- 10.1002/cpp.2051
- PMID
- 27739228
- Review status
- Machine draft
- Evidence level
- Single-study or moderate support from human research
- Last updated
- 8 April 2026
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →