Lacerda, Eliana M, McDermott, Clare, Kingdon, Caroline C et al. · Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019 · DOI
Researchers asked people with ME/CFS and MS about their experiences participating in a major study that collected blood samples and health information. Patients shared their hopes and frustrations about research, what they want scientists to study next, and how they'd like findings to be shared with them. The participants felt that research progress is like slowly putting together a puzzle, and they emphasized how important collaboration and persistence are.
This study directly incorporates ME/CFS patients' voices into research planning, addressing an often-overlooked aspect of medical research—how findings affect and are understood by those living with the disease. Understanding patient perspectives on research priorities and communication can help guide future studies toward questions that matter most to the ME/CFS community and improve how results are shared.
This qualitative study does not prove the efficacy of any particular treatments or establish biological mechanisms of ME/CFS. It reflects the experiences and preferences of participants in the UK Biobank and cannot be generalized to all people with ME/CFS worldwide. The study describes patient views rather than measuring clinical outcomes or validating specific research approaches.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →