Loft, Mia I, Foged, Eva M, Koreska, Mai · Qualitative health research · 2022 · DOI
This study listened to people who experienced long-lasting thinking and memory problems after recovering from COVID-19. Patients described how these cognitive symptoms disrupted their daily lives, work, and relationships, and left them feeling anxious and uncertain about their future. The researchers suggest that doctors and researchers could learn from how people with similar conditions—like ME/CFS—manage their symptoms while waiting for treatments.
This study highlights the substantial burden of persistent cognitive dysfunction after COVID-19 and draws an explicit parallel to ME/CFS, suggesting shared phenomenological features between post-COVID cognitive sequelae and ME/CFS. Understanding how patients with ME/CFS cope with similar uncertainty and symptom burden could inform better support strategies for both conditions. The authors' recommendation to cross-pollinate evidence between these conditions may accelerate development of symptom management approaches.
This qualitative study does not establish the prevalence, biological mechanisms, or natural history of post-COVID cognitive sequelae. It does not prove that post-COVID cognitive symptoms and ME/CFS are the same condition, only that they share similar psychological and social impacts. The study cannot determine which cognitive deficits are objective versus subjective, or identify effective treatments.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →