E3 PreliminaryWeak / uncertainPEM unclearReview-NarrativePeer-reviewedMachine draft
[From neurasthenia to post-exertion disease: Evolution of the diagnostic criteria of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis].
Murga, Íñigo, Lafuente, José-Vicente · Atencion primaria · 2019 · DOI
Quick Summary
This study traces how ME/CFS has been named and diagnosed over the past 150+ years, from 'neurasthenia' in the 1800s to today's 'post-exertional malaise.' The researchers reviewed medical literature to show how our understanding of this disease has evolved, and highlight that doctors still diagnose it mainly by symptoms and by ruling out other conditions, since no single biological marker has been found.
Why It Matters
Understanding the diagnostic history of ME/CFS helps patients and primary care physicians recognize the disease earlier and avoid lengthy diagnostic delays. This review demonstrates that the disease's complexity and lack of a single biological marker are long-standing challenges, validating patient experiences of diagnostic confusion and emphasizing the need for improved clinical recognition.
Observed Findings
- ME/CFS has been described in medical literature under multiple names since the 1800s, reflecting evolving understanding of the condition.
- The disease is classified as a neurological disorder (ICD-10: G93.3) despite absence of histopathological findings.
- Multiple organic abnormalities have been documented across various body systems, but no single unifying biological mechanism has been identified.
- Current diagnosis relies exclusively on clinical presentation and exclusion of other diseases, with no validated biomarker.
- Some authors propose ME/CFS belongs within central sensitivity syndromes sharing common pathophysiological mechanisms.
Inferred Conclusions
- The terminology and diagnostic approach to ME/CFS have evolved substantially over 150 years, yet fundamental diagnostic challenges persist.
- Primary care physicians play a critical role in early detection and require clear diagnostic frameworks to identify patients with unexplained chronic fatigue lasting >6 months.
- CFS/ME should be conceptualized as a neuro-immune-endocrine dysfunction with high morbidity affecting physical and mental functioning.
- Despite substantial clinical documentation of disease features, the underlying pathophysiology remains incompletely understood and requires further biological investigation.
Remaining Questions
What This Study Does Not Prove
This literature review does not establish new diagnostic criteria, identify biomarkers, or prove the underlying cause of ME/CFS. It cannot determine whether central sensitization or neuro-immune-endocrine dysfunction is the correct pathophysiological model, as it is a survey of existing literature rather than original research with patient data.
Tags
Symptom:Post-Exertional MalaiseCognitive DysfunctionPainFatigue
Method Flag:PEM Not DefinedWeak Case Definition
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →