E3 PreliminaryPreliminaryPEM unclearObservationalPeer-reviewedMachine draft
Using Communities of Practice Theory to Understand the Crisis of Identity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).
Murray, Rebecca, Turner, Lynda · Chronic illness · 2023 · DOI
Quick Summary
This study looked at how ME/CFS affects how people see themselves and their identity. Researchers created a private Facebook group with 22 people who have ME/CFS and asked them to share their experiences. They found that supportive communities—whether online or with understanding people—help patients develop a stronger sense of self that isn't defined solely by illness or shame.
Why It Matters
Identity disruption is a significant but often overlooked aspect of ME/CFS experience. This research validates that supportive communities—both online and in-person—can help patients reconstruct meaningful identities and may improve psychological wellbeing. The findings also offer health professionals and families actionable insight into how their approach affects patients' sense of self.
Observed Findings
- Participants distinguished between 'enabling communities' (supportive, validating) and 'disabling communities' (invalidating, stigmatizing) in shaping their lived experience
- Active participation in supportive communities correlated with participants developing identities not centrally defined by loss or stigma
- Virtual communities provided spaces where participants could explore purpose and meaning alongside their illness
- Participants reported that learning to exist 'alongside' ME/CFS rather than being defined by it contributed to sense of empowerment
- Facebook communities functioned as platforms for positive identity change and mutual support
Inferred Conclusions
- Communities of Practice framework effectively explains how social participation shapes identity formation in ME/CFS populations
- Supporting community engagement may be a valuable intervention for addressing the psychological and identity-related impacts of ME/CFS
- Virtual communities offer particular value as accessible spaces for identity work, especially for patients with mobility or energy limitations
- Healthcare providers and families should consider their role in either enabling or disabling identity development in ME/CFS patients
Remaining Questions
What This Study Does Not Prove
This study does not prove that online communities cure or treat ME/CFS symptoms, nor does it establish causation between community participation and clinical outcomes. As a small qualitative study, findings may not generalize to all ME/CFS patients, and the research cannot determine whether people with stronger identities have better health outcomes or vice versa.
Tags
Method Flag:No ControlsSmall SampleExploratory Only
Metadata
- DOI
- 10.1177/17423953211064989
- PMID
- 34866419
- Review status
- Machine draft
- Evidence level
- Early hypothesis, preprint, editorial, or weak support
- Last updated
- 10 April 2026
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →