Schlüssel, Sabine, Gensichen, Jochen · MMW Fortschritte der Medizin · 2020 · DOI
This article reviews how general practitioners (GPs) can best diagnose ME/CFS by examining which tests and questions make the most sense in a regular doctor's office. The authors looked at practical diagnostic steps that doctors can use when patients report feeling tired, weak, and exhausted to help identify ME/CFS versus other conditions that cause similar symptoms.
Early and accurate diagnosis of ME/CFS in primary care is critical for patients, as misdiagnosis or delayed recognition can lead to inappropriate treatment and worsening of symptoms. This review helps GPs identify practical diagnostic strategies that can improve recognition of ME/CFS in routine clinical practice, potentially reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes.
As a review article rather than a primary research study, this does not present new clinical data, conduct randomized trials, or provide definitive evidence about specific diagnostic test accuracy. It cannot establish which diagnostic tests are most sensitive or specific for ME/CFS, nor can it prove that recommended approaches improve patient outcomes compared to standard care.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →