Sehmbi, Tarnjit, Wearden, Alison, Peters, Sarah et al. · British journal of health psychology · 2024 · DOI
This study asked 21 women with ME/CFS in the UK about their experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown, particularly how living with their partners affected them. The researchers found that while lockdown disrupted the routines these women had carefully built to manage their illness, having their partners at home more often was actually helpful. Interestingly, the lockdown made them feel less different from the rest of society, though they worried greatly about catching COVID-19 and making their ME/CFS worse.
This study provides important qualitative insights into how major societal disruptions affect people with ME/CFS, a population often invisible and misunderstood. The findings highlight that routine management is critical for ME/CFS patients and suggests that external validation (reduced perceived difference) may have psychological benefits, while also revealing significant anxiety about disease progression—information valuable for healthcare providers supporting this community.
This qualitative study does not establish causation or provide generalizable quantitative data about ME/CFS populations beyond the 21 participants studied. The findings are specific to women with ME/CFS in UK relationships and cannot be applied to men, single individuals, or populations in other countries. The study also cannot determine whether the perceived benefits of partner presence or reduced difference actually improved clinical outcomes or were purely subjective experiences.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →