E3 PreliminaryPreliminaryPEM ✗Review-NarrativePeer-reviewedMachine draft
Language Matters: What Not to Say to Patients with Long COVID, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and Other Complex Chronic Disorders.
Smyth, Nancy J, Blitshteyn, Svetlana · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025 · DOI
Quick Summary
This study examines how healthcare providers talk to patients with Long COVID and ME/CFS, and how certain words and phrases can hurt patients emotionally and damage the doctor-patient relationship. The authors identified problematic language patterns used by doctors and suggest better ways to communicate with compassion and respect. The goal is to help healthcare providers have more supportive conversations with patients who have these complex, poorly understood illnesses.
Why It Matters
ME/CFS and Long COVID patients frequently report being disbelieved, dismissed, and gaslighted by healthcare providers, which compounds suffering and delays appropriate care. This study provides practical, evidence-based communication guidance that can help clinicians recognize and change harmful language patterns, potentially improving the clinical experience and therapeutic relationship for vulnerable patient populations. Better clinician-patient communication may reduce iatrogenic harm and support more compassionate, effective care delivery.
Observed Findings
- Healthcare professionals frequently use stigmatizing language and 'never-words' when interacting with patients with Long COVID and ME/CFS.
- Patients consistently report feeling disbelieved, judged, gaslighted, and dismissed by medical practitioners.
- Adversarial clinical interactions appear more likely in contexts of diagnostic uncertainty, absence of biomarkers, and lack of FDA-approved therapies.
- Problematic language patterns negatively impact the clinician-patient relationship and patient emotional wellbeing.
- Specific alternative phrasings aligned with therapeutic communication principles can replace harmful language.
Inferred Conclusions
- Training healthcare professionals to recognize and avoid 'never-words' and use compassionate, non-judgmental language can improve therapeutic relationships with ME/CFS and Long COVID patients.
- Best practices from difficult clinical conversation literature can be effectively adapted to support patients with complex chronic disorders lacking clear biomarkers.
- Language choice by clinicians carries significant emotional impact and may influence patient recovery and engagement with healthcare systems.
- Systemic change in clinician communication requires awareness of these patterns and intentional adoption of evidence-based alternative language.
Remaining Questions
What This Study Does Not Prove
This guideline does not provide empirical data proving that specific language changes causally improve patient outcomes, symptom severity, or clinical recovery rates. It does not establish biomarkers or diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS or Long COVID, nor does it demonstrate that problematic language is the primary barrier to care quality. The study focuses on communication best practices rather than testing their direct impact through randomized controlled trials.
Tags
Method Flag:Exploratory Only
Metadata
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph22020275
- PMID
- 40003500
- Review status
- Machine draft
- Evidence level
- Early hypothesis, preprint, editorial, or weak support
- Last updated
- 8 April 2026