Wang, Taiwu, Xu, Cong, Pan, Keli et al. · BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2017 · DOI
This study reviewed 31 previous research trials examining whether acupuncture and moxibustion (traditional Chinese treatments involving needles and heat) help treat ME/CFS. The researchers found that combining multiple acupuncture and moxibustion techniques appeared more effective than using just one technique, and both were more effective than sham acupuncture (fake treatment). However, the overall quality of the research studies reviewed was weak, so stronger evidence is needed before drawing firm conclusions.
This systematic review synthesizes existing evidence on acupuncture and moxibustion for ME/CFS, providing a comprehensive overview that could inform patient decisions about complementary treatments. Understanding comparative effectiveness between different traditional and conventional approaches helps guide clinical research priorities and treatment options in a condition where validated therapies remain limited.
This study does not prove that acupuncture or moxibustion effectively treat ME/CFS. The authors explicitly note that included trials have poor methodological quality, making it unclear whether reported "effective rates" reflect genuine clinical benefit, placebo effects, or reporting bias. The review does not establish mechanisms of action or identify which patient subgroups might benefit.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Spotted an error in this entry? Report it →